
At a geologic CO2 sequestration (GCS) site, geologic uncertainty usually leads to large uncertainty in the predictions of properties that influence metrics for leakage risk assessment, such as CO2 saturations and pressures in potentially leaky wellbores, CO2/brine leakage rates, and leakage consequences such as changes in drinking water quality in groundwater aquifers. The large uncertainty in these risk-related system properties and risk metrics can lead to over-conservative risk management decisions to ensure safe operations of GCS sites. The objective of this work is to develop a novel approach based on dynamic risk assessment to effectively reduce the uncertainty in the predicted risk-related system properties and risk metrics. We demonstrate our framework for dynamic risk assessment on two case studies: a 3D synthetic example and a synthetic field example based on the Rock Springs Uplift (RSU) storage site in Wyoming, USA. Results show that the NRAP-Open-IAM risk assessment tool coupled with a conformance evaluation can be used to effectively quantify and reduce the uncertainty in the predictions of risk-related system properties and risk metrics in GCS.
28 pages, 9 figures
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Geological CO 2 sequestration, Life on Land, Geologic CO2 sequestration, Computer Science - Information Theory, Information Theory (cs.IT), Geology, Numerical Analysis (math.NA), Geochemistry, Geophysics, Data assimilation, Earth Sciences, FOS: Mathematics, Integrated assessment model, Dynamic risk assessment, Mathematics - Numerical Analysis, Hydrology, Uncertainty quantification
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Geological CO 2 sequestration, Life on Land, Geologic CO2 sequestration, Computer Science - Information Theory, Information Theory (cs.IT), Geology, Numerical Analysis (math.NA), Geochemistry, Geophysics, Data assimilation, Earth Sciences, FOS: Mathematics, Integrated assessment model, Dynamic risk assessment, Mathematics - Numerical Analysis, Hydrology, Uncertainty quantification
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 18 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
