
This is a review article of Peter Birks, Unjust Enrichment (OUP, 2003) , criticising the argument for the introduction into English law of a doctrinal category of unjust enrichment, and discussing the role of justificatory and formal categories in the law and the nature of Birks's classification. It discusses restitution in property law and Birks's "core case" of the claim to recover a mistaken payment, and in contract law.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
