
handle: 10419/316579 , 1814/69871
Although the WTO has fulfilled several key tasks it was set up to do – providing periodic reviews of members’ trade policies, resolving disputes, supporting negotiations – with the notable exceptions of the Trade Facilitation and Information Technology agreements, WTO members have not been able to negotiate new rules on “bread and butter” trade policies. The importance of doing so was illustrated by the COVID-19 pandemic which saw widespread uncoordinated recourse to trade policy instruments. This paper highlights four reforms that would bolster the effectiveness of the WTO as a forum for trade cooperation: (1) improving collection and reporting of information on trade-related policies; (2) supporting analysis-informed deliberation to establish a common understanding of the need and scope for cooperation in specific policy areas; (3) putting in place a stronger multilateral governance framework for plurilateral cooperation between groups of WTO members; and (4) reestablishing an effective dispute settlement system.
transparency, Dispute Settlement, ddc:330, Trade cooperation, Trade Cooperation, Transparency, Economics as a science, Dispute settlement, Plurilateral agreements, WTO Reform, Plurilateral Agreements, F55, dispute settlement, trade cooperation, plurilateral agreements, F02, F13, wto reform, HB71-74
transparency, Dispute Settlement, ddc:330, Trade cooperation, Trade Cooperation, Transparency, Economics as a science, Dispute settlement, Plurilateral agreements, WTO Reform, Plurilateral Agreements, F55, dispute settlement, trade cooperation, plurilateral agreements, F02, F13, wto reform, HB71-74
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
