
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3749398
We provide evidence that stock prices are positively correlated with firm value in a cross-sectional framework. This is surprising as company managers can alter the stock price at their own discretion by changing the number of shares outstanding. Even more puzzling is that firms with a high stock price at the end of the year have lower returns in the subsequent year. After controlling for common risk factors, this underperformance amounts to 4.56% per year. We argue that investors wrongly interpret easily available information such as the stock price as a piece of relevant information signaling firm quality. As a result, when judging firm value, investors “anchor” their valuation to the share price and place a higher valuation on high-priced firms.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
