
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3729152
We introduce a new and complete ordering of prospects that is consistent with stochastic dominance (SD). Featuring loss aversion and skewness preference, it mitigates the low discriminatory power of SD and circumvents implementation difficulties associated with third order SD. To highlight its edge, we show that the Aumann-Serrano and the Foster-Hart general riskiness indicators do not conform to third order SD. The ordering we introduce sheds light on mean variance theory and performance measurement, related SD developments, and optimal diversification. Besides, it contributes to the explanation of Rabin's paradox and reconciles the discrepancy between moment preferences and expected utility theory.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
