
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3717455
Using the NYSE/NASDAQ listing rule changes to establish causality, we are the first to empirically show that board structure can significantly reduce the volatility of volatility of stock returns, which can be a consequence of erratic decision-making. The effect is moderated by firm characteristics such as size and fundamental risk. Furthermore, reduced fluctuations in investments, cash holdings, and leverage suggest that this results from improved policy consistency. We also find significantly higher stock returns after the change, but only for firms in stable industries, not dynamic ones. This suggests that not all firms benefit from the mandated new board structures.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
