
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.370260
In this article we show that different concepts of accounting for stock options under US-GAAP, IAS, German and Swiss accounting rules exist. Only the GASB concept requires the recognition of a personal expense at fair value. The different accounting methods can lead alone or in combination with EPS calculation requirements to huge problems concerning financial analysis. EPS calculation rules must be qualified with a special focus on the integration of stock options as not sufficient. EPS comparisons without adjustments concerning stock options should be used carefully. The paper shows further that as well the implementation of stock option plans causes implications for auditing.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
