
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.370242
The article provides a detailed analysis of the approach to estimate firms' default probabilities as it is proposed in the Credit Portfolio View model. It is shown that multiple systematic estimation errors and conceptual weaknesses occur in the methodology that prevent the results from being a credible assessment of a firm's default probability and in consequence of a portfolio's credit risk.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
