
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3683355
This paper examines the relationship between two important financial variables (price informativeness, and cost of capital) and information asymmetry, controlling for the total amount of information in the market. In the model, each investor has a private signal. We measure information asymmetry by the dispersion of the precision of the private signals. By doing so, we can isolate the effect of the total amount of information and focus on the influence of information asymmetry. We show that without the non-learnable component in the asset payoff (residual uncertainty) or transaction cost, information asymmetry will not affect the cost of capital and price informativeness, which is consistent with Lambert and Verrecchia (2015). In contrast, with residual uncertainty or transaction cost, an increase in information asymmetry will decrease price informativeness and increase the cost of capital, even in a fully competitive market. Our results highlight the importance for regulators of alleviating information asymmetry to improve market efficiency.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
