Over the spring of 2020, numerous states announced measures suspending abortions in response to COVID-19 Banning abortion during the pandemic is counterproductive Impeding access to abortion will not help preserve healthcare resources Moreover, prohibiting access to abortion care exacerbates the strain on the healthcare system People who lack access to abortions will travel to neighboring states, induce their own abortions, or carry pregnancies to term, which will require prenatal care and assistance in childbirth Perhaps more importantly, the people hit hardest by suspending abortion care are those for whom the pandemic already has had devastating effects Lifting restrictions on medication abortion and expanding telehealth abortion services will conserve healthcare resources and improve public health Recognizing the advantages of telemedicine, some states, as well as the federal government, have relaxed restrictions on remote diagnosis and treatment However, many of those same states have carved out exceptions for abortion in their telemedicine policies In addition, people seeking medication abortions still face unnecessary restrictions on access, none of which are applied to comparable office-based procedures Policymakers can eliminate barriers to safe abortion services now and in the future “No-touch” terminations, in which all medical supervision happens over the telephone or online, can better accomplish the goals that the present abortion suspensions cannot Telehealth for medical abortion can ease the burdens on pregnant people, healthcare workers, and health systems in light of the unprecedented challenges presented by COVID-19