
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3640350
Investor attention is central to explaining the mean-variance puzzle. Using Google Search Volumes as a proxy to attention, I document a positive trade-off during low attention periods that is significantly undermined when attention is high. The negative association between on-line searches and the trade-off is also present in the time-varying analysis. I also find that this deterioration can be explained by the escalation of risk brought about by the entry of retail investors into the market. The results are robust for several alternative explanations, such as data periodicity, conditional variance measures, on-line search terminologies and macroeconomic variables, and provide further support for the importance of noise-traders to stock market inefficiency.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
