Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

The Fungal Airway Microbiome in Cystic Fibrosis and Bronchiectasis

Authors: Leah Cuthbertson; Imogen Felton; Phillip James; Michael J. Cox; Diana Bilton; Silke Schelenz; Michael R. Loebinger; +3 Authors

The Fungal Airway Microbiome in Cystic Fibrosis and Bronchiectasis

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of fungal disease in cystic fibrosis (CF) and non-CF bronchiectasis is increasing and the clinical spectrum is widening. Poor sensitivity and a lack of standard diagnostic criteria renders interpretation of culture results challenging. In order to develop effective management strategies, a more accurate and comprehensive understanding of the airways fungal microbiome is required. The study aimed to use DNA sequences from sputum to assess the load and diversity of fungi in adults with CF and bronchiectasis. Methods: Next generation sequencing of the ITS2 region was used to examine fungal community composition (n = 176) by disease and underlying clinical subgroups including allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, chronic necrotizing pulmonary aspergillosis, non-tuberculous mycobacteria, and fungal bronchitis. Patients with no known active fungal disease were included as disease controls. Findings: ITS2 sequencing greatly increased the detection of fungi from sputum. In patients with CF fungal diversity was lower, while burden was higher than those with bronchiectasis. The most common operational taxonomic unit (OTU) in patients with CF was Candida parapsilosis (20·4%), whereas in bronchiectasis sputum Candida albicans (21·8%) was most common. CF patients with overt fungal bronchitis were dominated by Aspergillus spp., Exophiala spp., Candida parapsilosis or Scedosporium spp. This study provides a framework to more accurately characterize the extended spectrum of fungal airways diseases in adult suppurative lung diseases. Funding Statement: The project was supported by the Asmarley Trust, the Wellcome Trust and the NIHR Respiratory Disease Biomedical Research Unit at the Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, Imperial College London. IF was supported by an NIHR PhD studentship. Declaration of Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interests to disclose. Ethics Approval Statement: The study was approved by the Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospital Biomedical Research Unit Ethics Committee (Advanced Lung Disease Biobank Study Number: 10/H0504/9).

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!