
handle: 11336/166665
Abstract We incorporate theft into the standard partial equilibrium model. We focus on two scenarios, one in which the whole wealth is subject to theft, and another in which only final goods are stealable. There are major differences between the two scenarios. In the first one, a policy that increases output reduces crime, which is not necessarily so in the second one. In the first model, public police protection reduces crime, but in the second one it may very well increase it. In the first model, the competitive equilibrium allocates private police efficiently conditional on the crime rate, but does not in the second model. The differences are due to the fact that while in both models output markets affect crime, only in the second model does crime affect output markets.
POLICE, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.2, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5, THEFT, CRIME, APPROPRIATION, ECONOMIC EQUILIBRIUM
POLICE, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.2, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5, THEFT, CRIME, APPROPRIATION, ECONOMIC EQUILIBRIUM
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
