
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3528414
The present contribution is intended to illustrate some of the latest case-law of the Court on its jurisdiction under Articles 267 TFEU and the admissibility of requests for a preliminary ruling. It is submitted that a new trend seems to emerge (or, rectius, to consolidate): in a growing number of cases, the Court has been more rigorous in assessing its jurisdiction under Article 267 TFEU and in checking the admissibility of references from national courts.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
