
arXiv: 1912.11166
handle: 10419/239120
In today’s era of big data, deep learning and artificial intelligence have formed the backbone for cryptocurrency portfolio optimization. Researchers have investigated various state of the art machine learning models to predict Bitcoin price and volatility. Machine learning models like recurrent neural network (RNN) and long short-term memory (LSTM) have been shown to perform better than traditional time series models in cryptocurrency price prediction. However, very few studies have applied sequence models with robust feature engineering to predict future pricing. In this study, we investigate a framework with a set of advanced machine learning forecasting methods with a fixed set of exogenous and endogenous factors to predict daily Bitcoin prices. We study and compare different approaches using the root mean squared error (RMSE). Experimental results show that the gated recurring unit (GRU) model with recurrent dropout performs better than popular existing models. We also show that simple trading strategies, when implemented with our proposed GRU model and with proper learning, can lead to financial gain.
ddc:330, deep learning, artificial intelligence, neural networks, risk management, Mathematical Finance (q-fin.MF), cryptocurrency, predictive model, FOS: Economics and business, Quantitative Finance - Mathematical Finance, time series analysis, Pricing of Securities (q-fin.PR), trading strategy, Quantitative Finance - Pricing of Securities, Bitcoin
ddc:330, deep learning, artificial intelligence, neural networks, risk management, Mathematical Finance (q-fin.MF), cryptocurrency, predictive model, FOS: Economics and business, Quantitative Finance - Mathematical Finance, time series analysis, Pricing of Securities (q-fin.PR), trading strategy, Quantitative Finance - Pricing of Securities, Bitcoin
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 179 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
