
We compare the profit of the optimal third-degree price discrimination policy against a uniform pricing policy. A uniform pricing policy offers the same price to all segments of the market. Our main result establishes that for a broad class of third-degree price discrimination problems with concave profit functions (in the price space) and common support, a uniform price is guaranteed to achieve one half of the optimal monopoly profits. This profit bound holds for any number of segments and prices that the seller might use under third-degree price discrimination. We establish that these conditions are tight and that weakening either common support or concavity can lead to arbitrarily poor profit comparisons even for regular or monotone hazard rate distributions.
26 pages, 5 figures
FOS: Computer and information sciences, concave profit function, General Economics (econ.GN), market segmentation, Microeconomic theory (price theory and economic markets), uniform price, FOS: Economics and business, third-degree price discrimination, Computer Science - Computer Science and Game Theory, Economics - Theoretical Economics, Theoretical Economics (econ.TH), approximation, Economics - General Economics, Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT)
FOS: Computer and information sciences, concave profit function, General Economics (econ.GN), market segmentation, Microeconomic theory (price theory and economic markets), uniform price, FOS: Economics and business, third-degree price discrimination, Computer Science - Computer Science and Game Theory, Economics - Theoretical Economics, Theoretical Economics (econ.TH), approximation, Economics - General Economics, Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 17 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
