
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3490194
Should the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) regulate, and if so, what should it regulate and how? These issues depend on normative criteria, which can give rise to arguments for or against ICANN’s regulatory authority. These criteria could be legal, economic, political, technical and so on. If we treat this as a legal question, the ICANN Bylaws should provide at least part of the answer. Accordingly, ICANN’s regulatory authority is examined here based on its Bylaws, which contain an explicit prohibition to regulate outside its mission. However, the problem is that the mission’s boundaries are unclear.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
