
A central question in the analysis of fuel economy policy is whether consumers are myopic with regards to future fuel costs. We provide the first evidence on the consumer valuation of fuel economy from a natural experiment that provides exogenous variation in fuel economy ratings. We examine the short-run equilibrium effects of a restatement of fuel economy ratings that affected 1.6 million vehicles. Using the implied changes in willingness to pay, we find that consumers act myopically: consumers are indifferent between $1.00 in discounted fuel costs and $0. 16–0.39 in the purchase price when discounting at 4 percent. This undervaluation persists under a wide range of assumptions. (JEL D12, L62, L71, L11)
Q40, Fuel economy, ddc:330, H25, L11, Q4, regulation, Vehicles, fuel economy, vehicles, undervaluation, Myopia, D12, Fuel economy; Vehicles; Myopia; Undervaluation; Regulation, L71, myopia, Undervaluation, L62, Regulation
Q40, Fuel economy, ddc:330, H25, L11, Q4, regulation, Vehicles, fuel economy, vehicles, undervaluation, Myopia, D12, Fuel economy; Vehicles; Myopia; Undervaluation; Regulation, L71, myopia, Undervaluation, L62, Regulation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 37 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
