
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.340100
Debt is rarely risk-free. Yet, on grounds of simplicity, in most discussions on the weighted average cost of capital (WACC), we assume that the debt is risk-free. At the same, in the calculation of the WACC, we may use a value for the cost of debt d that is higher than the risk-free rate rf. In this teaching note, using simple binomial models, we examine the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) with risky debt and no taxes. Taxes raise additional complications. In a subsequent note, we analyze the case with taxes. With risky debt, we have to use the expected rate of return on the debt rather than the promised rate of return on the debt in the formula for the WACC. Furthermore, we model the expected cost of risky debt as an increasing function of the amount of debt.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
