
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3374456
This paper examines the allocation of market risk in a general class of collectivepension arrangements: Collective Defined Contribution (CDC) schemes. In a CDCscheme participants collectively share funding risk through benefit level adjustments. There is a concern that, if not well designed, CDC schemes are unfair and will lead to an unintended redistribution of wealth between participants and, in particular, between generations. We define a pension scheme as fair if all participants receive an arbitrage-free return on the market risk they bear. The fact that the participants’ claim the CDC schemes’ collective assets is expressed in terms of a stochastic future, makes the arbitrage-free allocation of market risk non-trivial. It depends crucially on the specification of the discount rate process in combination with the benefit adjustment process. We show that fair CDC schemes may use a default-free market interest rate in combination with a specific horizon-dependent benefit adjustment process. Alternative discount rates are also permissible, but require additional correction terms in the benefit adjustment process.
intergenerational risk-sharing, Social Security and Public Pensions, g23 - "Pension Funds; Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors", fair value, asset pricing, pension, h55 - Social Security and Public Pensions, Pension Funds; Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors, retirement, Contingent Pricing; Futures Pricing; option pricing, Nonwage Labor Costs and Benefits; Private Pensions, j32 - "Nonwage Labor Costs and Benefits; Private Pensions", g13 - "Contingent Pricing; Futures Pricing; option pricing", Retirement; Retirement Policies, j26 - "Retirement; Retirement Policies", funded pension systems
intergenerational risk-sharing, Social Security and Public Pensions, g23 - "Pension Funds; Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors", fair value, asset pricing, pension, h55 - Social Security and Public Pensions, Pension Funds; Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors, retirement, Contingent Pricing; Futures Pricing; option pricing, Nonwage Labor Costs and Benefits; Private Pensions, j32 - "Nonwage Labor Costs and Benefits; Private Pensions", g13 - "Contingent Pricing; Futures Pricing; option pricing", Retirement; Retirement Policies, j26 - "Retirement; Retirement Policies", funded pension systems
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
