Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

When Is the Client King? Evidence from Affiliated-Analyst Recommendations in China’s Split-Share Reform

Authors: Johnny Chan; Xuanyu Jiang; Donghui Wu; Nianhang Xu; Hong Zeng;

When Is the Client King? Evidence from Affiliated-Analyst Recommendations in China’s Split-Share Reform

Abstract

China’s split-share reform of 2005 (the Reform) converts the previously restricted shares held by founding shareholders to shares tradable on the open market. Against this backdrop, we study how underwriter-affiliated analysts and firms’ large shareholders interact in the event of the latter’s sales of restricted shares. We document that recommendations made by affiliated analysts are significantly more optimistic when firms’ large shareholders plan to sell their restricted shares. This optimism, however, is associated with negative post-sale stock returns, suggesting that large shareholders profit from share sales but at the cost of public investors. Furthermore, large shareholders sell more restricted shares through the affiliated brokerages with analysts issuing more optimistic recommendations and firms under their control are more likely to appoint such brokerages as lead underwriters when they refinance in the future. For the affiliated analysts, they conduct more site visits to the firms after the share sales, thereby improving their earnings forecast accuracy. Our analysis shows how conflicts of interest by financial intermediaries arise following the Reform and leads to large shareholders’ extraction of rents from public investors. These findings have regulatory implications.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!