
We study a unique experiment to examine the importance of rating agencies' private information for bank shareholders. On July 20, 2011, Fitch Ratings refined their bank standalone ratings, which measure intrinsic financial strength, from a 9-point to a 21-point scale. This refinement did not affect their all-in ratings, which combine assessments of intrinsic strength and extraordinary sovereign support and provide an estimate of banks' creditworthiness. Thus, the impact of the standalone rating refinement was cleanly limited to bank shareholders. We find evidence suggesting that the refinement resulted in higher than expected standalone ratings, but we find only weak evidence of ratings catering. We also find a positive relationship between stock price reactions and rating surprises, revealing that the rating refinement delivered useful information about the importance of bank characteristics for assessing intrinsic financial strength.
RISK, CERTIFICATION, INFORMATION, IMPACT, 10003 Department of Finance, 1502 Banking, Finance and Investment, Social Sciences, 1401 Economic Theory, 2002 Economics and Econometrics, OPAQUENESS, CONTAGION, Business, Finance, 3801 Applied economics, ANNOUNCEMENTS, 330 Economics, 3803 Economic theory, MARKET, 2003 Finance, Business & Economics, BANKRUPTCY, 3502 Banking, finance and investment, BOND, 1402 Applied Economics
RISK, CERTIFICATION, INFORMATION, IMPACT, 10003 Department of Finance, 1502 Banking, Finance and Investment, Social Sciences, 1401 Economic Theory, 2002 Economics and Econometrics, OPAQUENESS, CONTAGION, Business, Finance, 3801 Applied economics, ANNOUNCEMENTS, 330 Economics, 3803 Economic theory, MARKET, 2003 Finance, Business & Economics, BANKRUPTCY, 3502 Banking, finance and investment, BOND, 1402 Applied Economics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
