
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3337169
In this paper we study why people fail at backward induction. To this end, we conducted a mobile experiment consisting of 27 games. Our sample includes 6,677 subjects from over 100 countries. Data indicates that low subjects' skills and high complexity of games are behind the violations of backward induction. The challenge lies in measuring skills and complexity. Using response times, we develop a measure of skills and a measure of complexity. We also find that improving skills has a relatively larger impact on increasing the probability of people backward inducting than lowering complexity.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
