
ABSTRACT This paper uses a core-periphery distinction to characterize contemporary economics, economic methodology, and also today’s world economy. First, it applies the distinction to the organization of contemporary economics through an examination of the problem of explaining economics’ relations to and boundaries with other disciplines. Second, it argues that economics’ core-periphery organization is replicated in a similar organization of the use and practice of contemporary economic methodology in economics. Third, it draws on the use of the core-periphery thinking in economics itself regarding the uneven development of the world economy to provide possible foundations for economics and economic methodology being organized in core-periphery terms. Fourth, the paper briefly discusses three potential countervailing forces operating on the development of contemporary economics that might work against its core-periphery organization.
especialização, desenvolvimento desigual, Core-periphery, empirical turn, giro empírico, formal modeling, economia e outras disciplinas, economics and other disciplines, specialization, Economics as a science, metodologia econômica, modelagem formal, uneven development, economic methodology, Periferia, HB71-74
especialização, desenvolvimento desigual, Core-periphery, empirical turn, giro empírico, formal modeling, economia e outras disciplinas, economics and other disciplines, specialization, Economics as a science, metodologia econômica, modelagem formal, uneven development, economic methodology, Periferia, HB71-74
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
