
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3318432
When the Federal Reserve first paid interest on excess reserves (IOER) in October 2008, it presented a choice that banks had not previously faced. Banks could invest capital in precautionary excess reserves and earn a risk-free rate "better than" the treasury rate, or lend and earn a higher, but riskier interest rate. One-stage and two-stage panel estimations show "reserve premiums" are associated with a 6% ($601.5B) reduction in bank lending after accounting for increased lending due to QE. Results support the growing importance of policy discretion as IOER inverted interest rate incentives for counter-cyclical lending to that of cyclical lending.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
