It is a natural presumption that there should be less distorting taxation when there are more decisions based on the prices distorted by taxation. This note shows the need for an additional assumption in order to reach the conclusion. We consider a competitive model with one consumption good, labor, and human capital. We contrast the situation where human capital is chosen with that where the human capital level is a parameter, using the Le Chatelier principle. While the Le Chatelier principle signs the difference in substitution effects between the two models, there are other terms that are relevant as well. The assumption that the income derivative of human capital is small relative to its substitution effect is sufficient to sign the response of social welfare to wage taxation with fixed human capital at the value of the optimal wage tax with human capital chosen, thereby giving the presumptive result.