
The literature measures classification shifting as the relation between unexpected core earnings and income-decreasing special items. The general view in this literature is that managers shift core expenses to special items to inflate core earnings to achieve self-motivated reporting objectives. However, an additional possibility is that classification shifting helps investors better predict future performance. We find evidence of this positive consequence of classification shifting. Our study raises the possibility that measures of classification shifting in certain settings do not reflect managers’ opportunistic reporting. Given the relatively limited evidence in the literature on the consequences of classification shifting on investors, we believe these findings need to be considered as the literature moves forward.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
