
handle: 10419/195164
Multinational and multiproduct firms often experience uncertainty in the relative return of conducting activities in different markets due to, for example, exchange rate volatility or the changing prospects of different products. We study how a multi-divisional organization should optimally allocate decision-making authority to its managerial members when operating in such volatile markets. To be able to adapt its decisions to local conditions, the organization has to rely on self-interested division managers to collect and disseminate the relevant information. We show that if communication takes the form of verifiable disclosure, then centralized decision-making does not suffer from information asymmetry and it allows the headquarter of the organization to better cope with the inter-market uncertainty. However, a downside of centralization is that it can discourage information acquisition, and this negative effect is amplified by the need for coordinating the activities of different divisions. As a result, the optimality of decentralized decision-making can actually be driven by a large coordination motive.
Multinationales Unternehmen, decentralization, volatile markets, Koordination, ddc:330, verifiable disclosure, Zentralisation, M52, Centralization, costly exaggeration, 330 Economics, Dezentralisation, ECON Department of Economics, D82, centralization, 10007 Department of Economics, information acquisition, Informationsbeschaffung, coordinated adaptation
Multinationales Unternehmen, decentralization, volatile markets, Koordination, ddc:330, verifiable disclosure, Zentralisation, M52, Centralization, costly exaggeration, 330 Economics, Dezentralisation, ECON Department of Economics, D82, centralization, 10007 Department of Economics, information acquisition, Informationsbeschaffung, coordinated adaptation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
