
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3222290
Constitutional practice and case law was enriched by the latest decisions and judgments that changed main directions of Georgia’s constitutional development. Interpretational variations and positive transformation of judicial competences determined some interesting basic tendencies. Few audacious decisions made an illusion of changing classic “Negative Legislator’s” function to the “Positive Legislator” and tried to conquer new fields of constitutional competencies, despite positions of Parliament and Georgian political establishment. This article aims to analyze the latest case law of the Georgian constitutional court, basic tendencies and opportunity of transformation from negative to positive lawmaker.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
