
handle: 11585/855961
Summary: Most institutional investors gain access to commodities through diversified index funds, even though mean-reverting prices and low correlation among commodities' returns suggest that two-fund separation does not hold for commodities. In contrast to demand for stocks and bonds, we find that, on average, demand for commodities is largely insensitive to risk aversion, with intertemporal hedging demand playing a major role for more risk averse investors. Comparing the optimal strategies of investors who observe only the index to those of investors who observe all commodities, we find that information on commodity prices leads to significant welfare gains, even if trading is confined to the index only.
portfolio choice, Portfolio theory, long run, Commodities; Filtering; Intertemporal hedging; Long run; Portfolio choice, commodities, filtering, intertemporal hedging
portfolio choice, Portfolio theory, long run, Commodities; Filtering; Intertemporal hedging; Long run; Portfolio choice, commodities, filtering, intertemporal hedging
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
