
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3206608
This article will concentrate on Dutch law and US law. It will address the question how these legal systems treat prescription and limitation of actions regarding movable property. The central questions will be, first, whether prescription should run against an owner who cannot prevent the prescription or limitation period from running against him or her, and, second, what the disadvantages are if a possessor/defendant cannot rely on a limitation period or acquisitive prescription against a plaintiff.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
