
handle: 10419/175939 , 2027.42/39863
This paper develops a micro-econometric method to account for differences across distributions of household income. Going beyond the determination of earnings in labor markets, we also estimate statistical models for occupational choice and for the conditional distributions of education, fertility and non-labor incomes. We import combinations of estimated parameters from these models to simulate counterfactual income distributions. This allows us to decompose differences between functionals of two income distributions (such as inequality or poverty measures) into shares due to differences in the structure of labor market returns (price effects); differences in the occupational structure; and differences in the underlying distribution of assets (endowment effects). We apply the method to the differences between the Brazilian income distribution and those of the United States and Mexico, and find that most of Brazil's excess income inequality is due to underlying inequalities in the distribution of two key endowments: access to education and to sources of non-labor income, mainly pensions.
Economics, J22, Distribution, Mexiko, Brasilien, Business, C15, I31, Micro-simulations, D31, USA, ddc:330, J13, Inequality, Einkommensverteilung, Haushaltseinkommen, jel: jel:J22, jel: jel:D31, jel: jel:C15, jel: jel:I31, jel: jel:J13
Economics, J22, Distribution, Mexiko, Brasilien, Business, C15, I31, Micro-simulations, D31, USA, ddc:330, J13, Inequality, Einkommensverteilung, Haushaltseinkommen, jel: jel:J22, jel: jel:D31, jel: jel:C15, jel: jel:I31, jel: jel:J13
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
