
In this paper, I claim that in the context of the constitutional crisis that began in 2015, all main arguments made by the government and supporters of the ruling party in Poland, i.e. Law and Justice (PiS), are bad. First, I propose to go to obvious facts. Secondly, I will separately work on each argument that I think is bad. However, this is interesting that these arguments made by politicians or academic scholars, such as lawyers, sociologists, and philosophers, are in fact fake arguments. They are irrelevant and false. My approach is methodologically holistic (I analysed legal acts, judicial verdicts, political statements, interviews, etc., and I talked to ordinary people). Of my background, I have to make it clear: I am a Polish citizen living abroad and a scholar. I was born and grew up as well as was educated in Poland. Taking a legal-philosophical approach, in this essay I try to explain these diverse constitutional Polish issues in simple words.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
