
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3068461
handle: 10419/210434
We show that lenders join a U.S. commercial credit bureau when information asymmetries between incumbents and entrants create an adverse selection problem that hinders market entry. Lenders also delay joining when information asymmetries protect them from competition in existing markets, consistent with lenders trading off new market entry against heightened competition. We exploit shocks to information coverage to show that lenders enter new markets after joining the bureau in a pattern consistent with this trade-off. Our results illuminate why intermediaries voluntarily share information and show how financial technology that mitigates information asymmetries can shape the boundaries of lending.
Mechanism Design, Financial Instruments, adverse selection, collateral, fintech, Institutional Investors, Financial Risk and Risk Management, financial intermediation, specialization, G32, G23 - Non-bank Financial Institutions, Depository Institutions, Goodwill, ddc:330, D82 - Asymmetric and Private Information, D43 - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection, Micro Finance Institutions, G32 - Financing Policy, Mortgages, information sharing, Value of Firms, G21, credit bureaus, Capital and Ownership Structure, G21 - Banks
Mechanism Design, Financial Instruments, adverse selection, collateral, fintech, Institutional Investors, Financial Risk and Risk Management, financial intermediation, specialization, G32, G23 - Non-bank Financial Institutions, Depository Institutions, Goodwill, ddc:330, D82 - Asymmetric and Private Information, D43 - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection, Micro Finance Institutions, G32 - Financing Policy, Mortgages, information sharing, Value of Firms, G21, credit bureaus, Capital and Ownership Structure, G21 - Banks
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
