
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3028268
This paper addresses whether robo-advisors are “fiduciaries.” The simple answer is “yes.” As registered investment advisers, robo-advisors are deemed to be “fiduciaries” that owe a fiduciary duty of loyalty to their customers and can be liable for breach of fiduciary duty. But that is only half of the equation. Merely labeling robo-advisors as “fiduciaries” does not signify what fiduciary standard of care they are subject to, which should be of most interest to investors and regulators and is the subject of this paper.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
