
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2984860
Recent studies on the evolution of the EU budget suggest that punctuated equilibrium models best explain its evolution over time. However, a number of factors have combined to bring about major changes in the processes of budgeting in the EU. The paper outlines the drivers of this change in the light of relevant theories, showing how growing politicisation of EU budgeting and the increasing importance of electoral cycles in EU policy-making have led the EU Commission, in conjunction with the European Parliament, to seek to tie budgeting closer to its own, electorally defined mandate. Following the 2014 European elections, the Juncker Commission developed an investment plan that would signal this electorally-driven change without requiring a formal adaptation of the budget procedure. While it is too early to speak of an irreversible development, there are clear indications that we may be witnessing a major shift in the developmental logic of the EU budget. If formalised, cyclical EU budgeting processes could establish the foundations for political budget cycles.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
