
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.293979
Sector funds have grown into a nearly quarter-trillion dollar industry. This paper analyzes the performance of 607 actively managed stock sector funds listed on the CRSP Survivor-Bias Free US Mutual Fund Database during 1990-2000. We use a five-factor model and a portfolio regression technique to control for the look-ahead bias in performance measurement. We document three main results. First, sector funds as a group neither outperform nor underperform their benchmarks. Second, there is no evidence of persistence in sector fund performance. Third, sector fund investors as a group do not possess the ability to pick the winning sector funds or the winning sectors of the stock market.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
