
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2928064
This paper looks at the EU framework on transborder data transfers. In Maximilian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner, the Court of Justice of the European Union declared the EU-US Safe Harbor decision as invalid. Shortly after, the Commission announced its agreement with the US on a new framework for transatlantic data transfers: the EU-US Privacy Shield. After a revision of the first draft, the Privacy Shield entered into force on 12 July. Notwithstanding any shortcomings of the Privacy Shield with regard to access by US surveillance powers, the paper opines that the Privacy Shield is the advantageous transfer mechanism compared to other transborder data transfer mechanisms. The research mainly concentrates on the question whether the Privacy Shield might be used as a role model for data transfers to other third countries. This paper assesses the question by use of the data protection laws in Canada and India. The paper notes that mutual growing convergence between the different data protection systems may evolve over time. It concludes that a hybrid model might in some cases be the only way forward if the EU adheres to its regulation on transborder data transfers.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
