
arXiv: 1612.07742
handle: 11384/83623 , 11585/666191
We extend the "No-dynamic-arbitrage and market impact"-framework of Jim Gatheral [Quantitative Finance, 10(7): 749-759 (2010)] to the multi-dimensional case where trading in one asset has a cross-impact on the price of other assets. From the condition of absence of dynamical arbitrage we derive theoretical limits for the size and form of cross-impact that can be directly verified on data. For bounded decay kernels we find that cross-impact must be an odd and linear function of trading intensity and cross-impact from asset $i$ to asset $j$ must be equal to the one from $j$ to $i$. To test these constraints we estimate cross-impact among sovereign bonds traded on the electronic platform MOT. While we find significant violations of the above symmetry condition of cross-impact, we show that these are not arbitrageable with simple strategies because of the presence of the bid-ask spread.
33 pages, 5 figures
FOS: Economics and business, Quantitative Finance - Trading and Market Microstructure, Cross-impact; Fixed-income markets; Market impact; Market microstructure; MOT; Price manipulation; Finance; Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)2001 Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous), Cross-impact; Fixed-income markets; Market impact; Market microstructure; MOT; Price manipulation; Finance; Economics; Econometrics and Finance (all)2001 Economics; Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous), Trading and Market Microstructure (q-fin.TR)
FOS: Economics and business, Quantitative Finance - Trading and Market Microstructure, Cross-impact; Fixed-income markets; Market impact; Market microstructure; MOT; Price manipulation; Finance; Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)2001 Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous), Cross-impact; Fixed-income markets; Market impact; Market microstructure; MOT; Price manipulation; Finance; Economics; Econometrics and Finance (all)2001 Economics; Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous), Trading and Market Microstructure (q-fin.TR)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 41 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
