
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2833056
In this paper, we show that conditions derived under the CAPM ensure only weak exogeneity in a linear regression setting. Since strong exogeneity is not guaranteed, the OLS estimator of CAPM beta is only consistent but not necessarily unbiased. We provide empirical evidence that individual daily stock returns exibit regime-switching patterns and may violate strong exogeneity conditions. As such, the OLS estimator of CAPM beta is likely biased. Based on the empirical patterns of daily stock returns, we use three regime-switching models to illustrate thatthe OLS estimator of CAPM beta can be consistent but at the same time biased. Simulation results based on these three regime-switching models show that biases of the OLS beta estimator can be substantial.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
