
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2817959
This is the third of three papers by the author on Puerto Rico’s constitutional status. In this paper, the author revisits the voting paradox known as “Condorcet’s paradox” to explain the impasse over Puerto Rico’s constitutional status. Although Condorcet cycling is rare in politics, the author explains how the impasse over Puerto Rico’s status can be modelled as a Condorcet cycle and presents a possible solution to this stalemate: a simple range voting procedure.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
