
The choice of weighting method in constructing an equity portfolio affects not only the financial performance, but also its Shariah-compliance. We show how the implicit bets in market capitalization, fundamental value, equal and low risk weights can affect the individual's perception of Shariah compliance of the financial portfolio. For the universe of Shariah-compliant S&P 500 stocks over the period 1986–2014, we find that the risk-adjusted performance is improved when using the alternative weighting methods compared with the traditional use of market capitalization weighting. The choice of weighting method matters for the Shariah-compliant equity investor, both in terms of compliance with the primary objectives of Shariah investing and in terms of the secondary objective of optimizing the financial performance of the portfolio.
Islamic finance, Shariah-compliant investing, SDG 17 - Partnerships for the Goals, Equal weighting, Low risk weighting, Market capitalization, Fundamental weighting
Islamic finance, Shariah-compliant investing, SDG 17 - Partnerships for the Goals, Equal weighting, Low risk weighting, Market capitalization, Fundamental weighting
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 23 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
