
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2810884
Using a unique panel database, we identify volatility and plant size as relevant characteristics associated with the intensive and extensive margins of using temporary agency workers (TAW). We also evaluate the effects of a regulation that increased the regulatory burden on TAW. We find a negative impact of this regulation on a plant’s total employment (2% decrease) but negligible effects on a plant’s value added and production levels. We present evidence of substitution effects. On average, plants that used TAW before the regulation increased the use of permanent workers by 1% and inventory share by 10% after the regulation.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
