
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2809828
The place of espionage under international law is an uneasy one. Many look to state practice, and conclude that acts of espionage must surely be legal because so many states spy on one another.1 Others say that sending spies in to the territory of another state breaches the norm of territorial and sovereign integrity, and therefore acts of espionage should rightly be considered illegal pursuant to the relevant legal rules.2 The difficulty in assessing legality is amplified when analyzing cyber intrusions, because they do not offend the principle of territorial integrity in the same way that sending an actual state agent to gather human intelligence (colloquially referred to as “HUMINT”) would. This paper is an attempt to address these legal ambiguities.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
