
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2799550
This paper analyzes a fund manager's portfolio optimization problem when compensated by either a high-water marks (HWM) contract or a recurring option contract with a fixed benchmark rate. In a model with an indefinite number of periods, the compensations are paid out annually, while the manager's portfolio decision is made in continuous time. The manager’s utility increases with the rate of the performance fee and decreases with the level of HWM and the option contract benchmark rate. Both types of contracts encourage risk taking in general. The HWM provision has a net disciplinary effect on the manager's risk taking incentive.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
