
handle: 10419/203977 , 10419/154266 , 10419/126565
AbstractThis paper studies the great collapse in value added trade using a structural decomposition analysis. We show that changes in vertical specialization accounted for more than 40% of the great trade collapse. Second, we find that the drop in the overall level of demand accounted for roughly a quarter of the decline in value added exports while just under one third was due to compositional changes in final demand. Finally, we demonstrate that the dichotomy between services and manufacturing sectors observed in gross exports during the great trade collapse is not apparent in value added trade data.
Great trade collapse, input-output tables, Structural decomposition analysis, Trade in value added, Vertical specialization, Input-output tables, Great trade collapse, ddc:330, great trade collapse, vertical specialisation, trade in value added, input-output tables, structural decomposition analysis, great trade collapse, R15, vertical specialisation, F2, F1, Vertical specialisation, Structural decomposition analysis, trade in value added, Vertical specialization, Trade in value added, input-output tables, structural decomposition analysis, C67, jel: jel:C67, jel: jel:F1, jel: jel:F2, jel: jel:R15
Great trade collapse, input-output tables, Structural decomposition analysis, Trade in value added, Vertical specialization, Input-output tables, Great trade collapse, ddc:330, great trade collapse, vertical specialisation, trade in value added, input-output tables, structural decomposition analysis, great trade collapse, R15, vertical specialisation, F2, F1, Vertical specialisation, Structural decomposition analysis, trade in value added, Vertical specialization, Trade in value added, input-output tables, structural decomposition analysis, C67, jel: jel:C67, jel: jel:F1, jel: jel:F2, jel: jel:R15
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 27 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
