
handle: 20.500.14352/124277
This paper analyzes the short-term market efficiency of the mutual fund industry around the world. Using a unique database of worldwide domestic equity funds, it employs a parametric (regression model) and non-parametric (data envelopment analysis (DEA) model) approaches to establish a relation between cost (expense ratio, turnover, loads, and risk) and benefit (return) of mutual funds. The empirical results of the parametric approach show a statistically significant negative relationship between expenses and risk-adjusted performance across countries. When we reexamine this relationship using a non-parametric approach, we show, in contrast to our previous result, a positive relationship between expenses and risk adjusted performance. Thus, using the DEA methodology, we find strong evidence that equity mutual funds around the world are approximately mean–variance efficient.
Administración de empresas, 5311 Organización y Dirección de Empresas, Finanzas, Data envelopment analysis, Multiple criteria decision, G11, G12, Mutual funds, Portfolio efficiency
Administración de empresas, 5311 Organización y Dirección de Empresas, Finanzas, Data envelopment analysis, Multiple criteria decision, G11, G12, Mutual funds, Portfolio efficiency
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 63 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
