
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2765647
There is no overall consensus about which measure is the most suitable for evaluating portfolios’ performance. Despite being affected by some of the statistical characteristics of returns, Sharpe ratio is the most widely used measure for portfolio performance evaluation. Thus, the other measures such as Treynor ratio or Modigliani and Modigliani (M2) are considered as alternatives to the Sharpe ratio. Using daily and monthly returns, our study confirms that these measures provide comparable results across countries, even examining the relative performance of mutual funds to a benchmark using the M2 approach. We obtain the same performance ranking regardless of the measure employed.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
