
handle: 10419/129092 , 10419/125064 , 10419/232078
Most studies on the relationship between public debt and economic growth implicitly assume homogeneous debt effects across their samples. We – in accordance with recent literature – challenge this view and state that there likely is a great deal of cross-country heterogeneity in that relationship. However, other than scholars assuming that all countries are different, we expect that clusters of countries differ. We identify three country clusters with distinct economic systems: Liberal (Anglo Saxon), Continental (Core EU members) and Nordic (Scandinavian). We argue that different degrees of fiscal uncertainty at comparable levels of public debt between those economic systems constitute a major source of heterogeneity in the debt-growth relationship. Our empirical evidence supports this assumption. Continental countries face more growth reducing public debt effects than especially Liberal countries. There, public debt apparently exerts neutral or even positive growth effects, while for Nordic countries a non-linear relationship is discovered, with negative debt effects kicking in at public debt values of around 60% of GDP.
P10, ddc:330, Economic Systems, P51, economic systems, economic growth, Public Debt, Fiscal Policy, Welfare State, Economic Growth, public debt, H10, E62, fiscal policy, welfare state
P10, ddc:330, Economic Systems, P51, economic systems, economic growth, Public Debt, Fiscal Policy, Welfare State, Economic Growth, public debt, H10, E62, fiscal policy, welfare state
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 56 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
