
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2730750
This paper analyzes the effects on the Spanish banking system of the new rules for calculating bank contributions to deposit guarantee schemes (DGSs) established by the European Directive dated 16 April 2014. Our sample represents over 90% of the covered deposits in Spain during the period from 2008 to 2014. We follow the guidelines published by the European Banking Authority in 2015, which propose two different methods for calculating risk weights: the bucket method and the sliding scale method. We find that most banks would increase their contributions to DGSs under the new system based on risk-adjusted contributions, indicating a cross-subsidy in the flat-rate system from lower-risk credit institutions to higher-risk institutions. Moreover, we report that the bucket method would provide stronger incentives for banks to engage in prudent risk management. Finally, we conclude that the new system could reduce the moral hazard often associated with larger banks.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
